- Local every day in
UPDATE: Buena Vista Residents Protest Against Cell Phone Tower Proposal
The debate about whether AT&T can erect a 20-foot tower in the Buena Vista neighborhood is yet another chapter in a growing debate about how Walnut Creek and other communities deal with the proliferation of wireless communication antennas.
Holding signs decrying the city's "lack of transparency in its decision making process," about two dozen Buena Vista residents—some with kids in tow—rallied outside Walnut Creek's City Hall on Tuesday, raising concerns about a proposal to place a wireless communications tower on a Catholic church-owned knoll above their neighborhood.
The protesters brought their complaints in the City Council chambers, using the public comment portion of the meeting to air grievances about the city's choice of a particular consultant to review AT&T's proposal and questioning whether the company has fully explored the potential for finding other sites for their 20-foot tower.
"We would like to see an open an transparent review of the process," said Mardi Veiluva, leader of the Walnut Creek Buena Vista neighborhood group.
Veiluva alleges that AT&T has unfair influence over decisions at Walnut Creek City Hall. These concerns in part come from the fact that Ken Mintz, the AT&T executive in charge of pushing for cell phone towers in Contra Costa County, is chairman of the board of the Walnut Creek Chamber of Commerce and also serves on the board of directors of the San Ramon Chamber of Commerce.
Mintz's chamber ties, Veiluva and other Buena Vista residents say, have raised concerns about "his involvement in local business organizations with close ties to the City Council in order to influence approval of cell-tower applications."
An AT&T spokesman has denied that Mintz's chamber ties gives him unfair advantage over Walnut Creek affairs.
“AT&T has been part of the Walnut Creek and San Ramon communities for decades," Lane Kasselman said Monday. "Thousands of our employees and their families live, work and play throughout the region. Our employees participate in service organizations, chambers of commerce, school boards, Little Leagues, Scout troops, PTAs, bake sales and almost every other type of civic engagement you would expect from active members of the community."
Back in November, the city considered Buena Vista residents' call for a moratorium on more cell phone tower construction, thinking it would give the city a chance to review its ordinance on wireless communication facilities in residential areas.
But the City Council decided hold off on any decision on a moratorium and instead asked staff to commission an engineering study that looks at whether the St. Stephen's church property is the only place for AT&T to build an antenna to provide better cell phone coverage to residents of northwest Walnut Creek.
Because the concerns of Buena Vista residents were not on Tuesday's meeting agenda, city council members legally could not respond or take any action. But City Manager Ken Nordoff was able to provide an update on what steps the city has taken to hire an outside consultant.
Nordhoff said the city received two bids to do the work, and chose the Los Angeles-based Kramer Firm Inc., belonging to Jonathan Kramer. The Kramer Firm says it has 20 ,years' experience helping "hundreds of local and state government planning agencies process wireless tower applications," according to its website.
Nordhoff said Kramer is set to begin work next week and would meet with residents to hear their concerns about the cell phone tower for the St. Stephen's property.
But Buena Vista neighbors question the choice of Jonathan Kramer over another consultant, Center for Municipal Solutions, based in North Carolina, which helps local governments regulate communications towers and wireless facilities.
Buena Vista resident Liz Menkes said the Center for Municipal Solutions is known for giving communities control over the process while Kramer's firm has a reputation for "going along with the wireless industry."
The debate about the St. Stephen's proposal is yet another chapter in a growing debate about how Walnut Creek deals with the proliferation of wireless communication antennas. Like other communities, Walnut Creek faces a growing demand for faster, more efficient wireless service for cell phones, laptop computers and GPS monitors.
Buena Vista residents say AT&T's proposed tower at St. Stephen's Church would rise about 100 feet from nearby homes. Residents also are concerned about AT&T’s recent announcement that it will add 55 cell sites in the San Francisco Bay area in 2011.
“If cities do not require a rigorous, open and independent review of alternatives, there is the strong possibility of cell towers being installed in inappropriate locations," said Veiluva. “We need a balanced and transparent approach by cities to ensure that cell towers are installed in the least intrusive locations in order to preserve and protect our residential neighborhoods.”
Jojo Potato
6:57 am on Tuesday, April 19, 2011
So the city council is beholden to the chamber which is controlled by business? Who would have thought? Be sure to bring your cell phone to the protest so you can upload the pictures.
obiwan
12:59 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Walnut Creek needs a strong ordinance to protect the neighborhoods from inappropriate cell tower placement, and the Buena Vista neighbors DESERVE an independent and unbiased evaluation of alternatives to the proposed AT&T cell tower at St. Stephen’s church.
Although the City promised the neighbors an “independent” review of AT&T’s proposal last November, the City apparently solicited input from AT&T in formulating the request for that study. The City’s own email record shows that AT&T has been in direct contact with the mayor regarding the “independent” consultant. And even though the Buena Vista neighbors have devoted an extraordinary amount of time and effort in researching both the legal and technical aspects of cell tower placement, they were shut out of the process.
Cell phone use is exploding and new capacity is needed. The question is whether the wireless providers will be allowed to plop towers anywhere they choose, or whether the City will impose some restrictions to assure that tower placement is sensitive to the concerns of the neighborhoods and the environment. Whose interests does the City Council represent – the residents of this City or AT&T?
The Merry One
6:48 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011
“AT&T has been part of the Walnut Creek and San Ramon communities for decades," Kasselman said. "Thousands of our employees and their families live, work and play throughout the region. Our employees participate in service organizations, chambers of commerce, school boards, Little Leagues, Scout troops, PTAs, bake sales and almost every other type of civic engagement you would expect from active members of the community."
Your point, Mr. Kasselman? How wonderful that AT&T employees participate in their communities like many of the rest of us, but this doesn't give their employer the right to ramrod its wishes on the community. You're not suggesting that community service and good citizenship come with a price tag, are you?
Im4WC
7:47 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011
I think his point was that just because Mintz participates in the community by being on theWC Chamber Board of Directors doesn't mean his judgment should be questioned.
Im4WC
7:48 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011
How many people showed up?
michael frederick
12:01 pm on Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Im4WCshopping,
ANYONE who participates on the Chamber of Commerce Board that participates in corrupting Walnut Creek election laws SHOULD BE QUESTIONED, particularly when it comes time for them to get their pay-back in the form of curtailed City process. I don't regard that as an opinion, but fact.
Such folks obviously have a history of bad judgment. That should be considered by the community just as your bank considers your credit score when you apply for a loan. I think the spotlight is just where it should be and Buena Vista gets it.
obiwan
2:49 pm on Wednesday, April 20, 2011
If you are an aficionado of unresponsive government, you have to appreciate the truly masterful job the City Council did of blowing off the Buena Vista neighborhood. After the neighbors made their comments, the City Manager gave a summary of events to date which neither addressed, nor even acknowledged any of the issues raised by the residents.
Was AT&T invited to provide input on the RFP while the neighbors were excluded? Did AT&T ever provide the City with information on alternative sites? Did AT&T even consider any alternative sites? Was inaccurate information about the Center for Municipal Solutions given to the panel which selected the “independent” consultant? Were those inaccuracies ever corrected? What was the nature of Ken Mintz’s contact with the Mayor (referenced in the City’s email record)?
What happens in City Hall, stays in City Hall.