- Local every day in
Should the City Charge Late-Night Bars a Special Fee for the Extra Police Attention They Require?
In these tough budget times, the City Council wants to explore charging downtown bars something for having police and public services deal with the impact of their sometimes rowdy, usually alcohol-fueled, crowds.
Maybe the city won't have enough money in the future to provide crossing guards to help Walnut Creek kids get to school, or crisis counselors to help some kids once they get there. Or to provide two unique summer camps aimed at nurturing kids' inner artists and kids who have disabilities.
Popping up into this ongoing City Council budget discussion about which programs to save and which to cut was the idea to institute some kind of fee on those downtown bars that stay open past midnight.
(You can also read our story on council members other proposed solutions for saving the above-mentioned programs, as well as several others.)
These dozen or so alcohol-serving establishments demand quite a bit of police monitoring on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights, according to Chief Joel Bryden and some council members. Officers from both the swing and grave yard shifts are dedicated to making sure the streets stay safe before, during and after bars close.
At these bars, some patrons will fuel up--too much--on liquid courage. Some get disruptive in the bars, or outside of them. Fights might break out, and young women have been known to pass out and not be able to get home. Guys--and girls--have also been known to find not-so-discreet corners in front of businesses to relieve themselves. A few might jump in their cars and drive away with more than the legal limit of alcohol in their system.
Just last Friday night, reports say that large group of young males got into a fight off Geary Road. A short time later, some of those males might have turned up in downtown, near Crogan's Bar and Grill and McDonald's. Police arrested two for being drunk in public.
Chief Joel Bryden estimates that the police department probably spends about $150,000 a year on dealing with the impact of the late-night bar scene.
Mayor Pro Tem Cindy Silva expressed concerns about the city's priorities: "It's one thing to talk about how we might not have enough money for crisis counselors and crossing guards, but we have enough money to support police and public services to benefit these [bars], which don't provide us with a direct benefit."
Councilman Bob Simmons said he'd like to see City Staff come up with a recommendation for imposing some kind of fee: "These late night bars are having an impact on the city disproportionate to what they provide. We're giving a major subsidy to five or six places that I can't justify."
In these ongoing budget talks--aimed to finalize a 2010-12 budget by June 15--the idea for imposing a fee on these bars is new. Council members acknowledged that it couldn't be imposed to help the city deal with its immediate budget issues. Actually, any fee probably would not be worked out until the fall when the city presents the findings of its alcohol task force. City Planner Victoria Walker told the council that imposing fees on bars is one matter that is addressed in the task force study.
Currently, there are six bars that stay open to 2 a.m. and a half dozen or so that stay open past midnight. Council members were thinking that those bars would share the costs to police to patrol the downtown during bar closing time.
Both Mayor Sue Rainey and Council Member Gary Skrel expressed reservations about spreading this $150,000 to those six to 12 bars, with Skrel concerned that this potentially large fee, even on some "bad apples," would discourage a vibrant downtown night life.
Silva had a different take on this "vibrant" night life: "Many people who live in Walnut Creek do not consider what happens after 11 p.m. in Walnut Creek to be part of a vibrant downtown," she said. "It's just a bar scene."
m sheridan
7:59 am on Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Yes. The bar scene does not add to a vibrant nightlife--- just adds to the headaches of the local people. Let the bars pay for the services of their unruly patrons and close the bars at midnight.
Night School Basketball Training - Jim Croy
10:50 am on Wednesday, June 2, 2010
This stuff is classic, go look at the campaign contribution documents (public information that you can request from city clerk) and see who donates money to the campaigns of the likes of Sue Rainey and others. You will find the name Dudum appearing numerous times and Mark Hall (large developer) collects the max $150 from his employees and associates collects up all the checks and turns them over to these campaigns to these candidates for "favors" and "perks" down the road. This is not to pick on the two names mentioned above but to site specific examples there are many others as well. I guarantee you money will talk and Simmons and Saliva will be shut down as they will be reminded as to who supports and finances their campaigns (bar owners and developers who lease out space to these restaurants and bars). Really a sad state of affairs. Money talks and that goes for Walnut Creek as well. Public is too busy with their daily tasks of work and raising families to ever dig into this stuff but it is the truth and as usual the truth hurts.
Masterlock
12:57 pm on Wednesday, June 2, 2010
I like the idea but making businesses pay for the city's extremely frustrating ability to balance a budget is dangerous ground. I personally haven't gone out in downtown Walnut Creek for years late at night, so I can't really comment on the scene, but I have a feeling a majority of the trouble makers have out of town zip codes.
Night School Basketball Training - Jim Croy
3:28 pm on Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Mr. Bob Brittain,
Appreciate your response. No doubt many upstanding citizens contribute to all candidates. There are also a large number of donations by business owners and those that take orders from them that make sure they support candidates that can and will help them down the road. The money does add up and allows these candidates to leave their mark via mailers, advertisements, signage all over the downtown properties, etc. There are favors done by city council to their favorite business owners and vice versa, you are blind if you believe otherwise. Not sure how engaged you are in this process but I can tell you from what I know it is an unfortunate TRUTH. Interesting how the council recently turned the page on the incidents at the Dudum owned 1515 club and even with a zero tolerance policy that was violated more than half a dozen times, council said don't worry about it and moved on despite the police chief arguing the other way, most recent case of protecting those that support them. Another study - Mike Parness was run out of town as City Mgr when he had concerns with library plans at $40mm +, we have a nice library now, but cant afford crossing guards. I am by know means dimissive about mental capabilities of WC citizens. If I walked my street and randomly knocked on 20 doors, I would be willing to bet 25% or less could not tell me more than one member of our city council. Most people are focused on their families and trust the right thing is being done.