.

Saving SF Bay: Environment Wins Round One

Cargill/DMB have withdrawn their first proposal to destroy valuable SF baylands in order to build a massive housing development...

As a result of opposition by the Chapter, Redwood City residents, Save the Bay, Redwood City Neighbors United, the Committee for Green Foothills, and other environmental groups, Cargill and Arizona developer DMB Associates have withdrawn their initial plan for filling in the baylands around Redwood City. The initial ‘Saltworks’ proposal would have turned 1,436 acres of eminently restorable sea-level Cargill salt ponds into a mini-city of 32,000 residents and a million square feet of office space behind three miles of new levees, in an earthquake zone, and far removed from downtown infrastructure.

The Chapter has been working with other environmental groups since 2008 to prevent this development. In addition to voicing our opposition directly to Redwood City Council Members, we have hosted educational events and engaged in a campaign to publicize our views in local media.

Round Two is Coming Up

In its May 4 news release, DMB Associates announced that they will soon submit a revised plan. This is the typical modus operandi — big developers first propose a huge project and then whittle it down, pressing people to accept this “compromise” as reasonable.

While we celebrate the withdrawal of the initial plan, we must recognize that this is just round one. The fight is far from over. Unless Cargill and DMB Associates have a complete change of heart and decide to stop their campaign to profit by destroying baylands, we will have to continue our fight to preserve one of nature’s most valuable wildlife habitats.

Is DMB’s whittled-down proposal likely to be reasonable? Absolutely not. If past experience is any guide, we would expect the new proposal to be only slightly smaller than the initial one, still large enough to cause all of the problems that made the first project so objectionable. Significant portions of Bay wetlands will still be paved over, wildlife will still be displaced, and the effort to restore healthy wetlands will be halted—perhaps for good.

Ninety percent of San Francisco baylands, an area that used to teem with wildlife and was an important stop on the Pacific Flyway for migrating birds, has been lost. Since massive fill-in-the-bay projects were mostly halted in the late 1960s—Redwood Shores was the last big project—the baylands have been coming back bit by bit. Even the old salt ponds are now used by various species struggling to reestablish viable habitats. We cannot allow this trend to reverse; we cannot return to the benighted days before the 1960s when valuable baylands were destroyed with abandon.

Instead of a “compromise,” Cargill and DMB should donate the salt ponds to the public or sell them at a reasonable price for full restoration, so that baylands regeneration can continue. Scientists say we need approximately 100,000 bayland acres to reestablish a vibrant natural habitat for wildlife and migrating birds. We appeal to Cargill and DMB to plumb the depths of their own consciences—to set aside profits for once and consider doing something for all the inhabitants of our earth.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Steve B. July 25, 2012 at 12:12 AM
This is an excellent article. Thank you for bringing forward such important information in regards to the continuing battle against those who put profit over the care and preservation of wildlife habitation. I'm sure you're right. The revised plan will be a slightly watered-down version that will still be very contrary to the environment. Wouldn't it be wonderful if a wealthy individual or company purchased the wildlife habitat and set it up as a preserve? I suppose I'm being a bit starry-eyed but, is it possible that there is a data base out there that might attract the attention of those inclined to donate funds in this way? Urban sprawl never ceases. Its particularly offensive when it continues to invade and destroy natural habitat.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »