.
Feedback

Walnut Creek Interview Began Transgender Case

April 20 ruling affirms ballistics expert who was turned down for federal employment; it has national implications.

A case with national implications emerged from a Walnut Creek job interview that led to a decision of employment discrimination that targeted a transgender person.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on April 20 ruled unanimously in favor of Mia Macy, who was seeking a job with the office of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Walnut Creek. A ballistics expert, Macy was represented by the Transgender Law Center in San Francisco. It's the first time the national commission has clarified that transgender people are covered by sex discrimination statues, said Transgender Law Center Director Masen Davis, according to KCBS.


Macy presented herself as a man when she interviewed for a job with the ATF in Walnut Creek. She was offered a position as long as she could pass a background check. A few months later, she informed the civilian contractor who would officially hire her for ATF work that she was transitioning from male to female, according to Jacob Combs in an article for Prop8TrialTracker. Five days later, she got the news that the position was no longer available, Combs reported.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Walnut Creek Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
WCJess May 19, 2013 at 02:44 pm
I hate sand in parks. Nice breeding area for lice, and a great place for ferrel cats to poop. IRead More can't wait for them to do the park at Arbolado.
Jojo Potato May 18, 2013 at 01:58 pm
How about you research the current ADA guidelines regarding surface materials for play areas?Read More Walnut Creek is simply acting to be in compliance. Not sure where you get the idea that wood chips are "much more dangerous". A reasonable overview of the current regulations can be found here: http://risk.utah.gov/newsletter/documents/playground_surfacing.pdf If you disagree with the regulations, please contact your representatives.