.
Feedback

Poll: Favor Gov Brown's Water Tunnel Plan?

Gov. Jerry Brown's proposal would divert water from the San Joaquin Delta for agribusiness and residential drinking water.

Gov. Jerry Brown and federal officials have announced plans for a future water delivery system that includes the construction of a $14 billion pair of tunnels that would divert water from the Sacramento River.

The side-by-side underground tunnels, 33 feet in diameter, would run beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and carry water 35 miles to pumps near Tracy to be distributed for human consumption and agribusiness outside of the immediate Delta area.

The joint state and federal project has set 2017 as the start of construction. Agribusiness and other interests have agreed to help pay for construction.

The project doesn't need voter approval. However, operating the system may hinge on a water bond measure that could be on the ballot as early as 2014, according to the Contra Costa Times.

On Wednesday, Brown and U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken
Salazar announced a "proposed path forward" for the Bay Delta Conservation
Plan,
which has been in the works since 2006.

The tunnels, which have been compared to the Peripheral Canal proposal shot down by voters in 1982, are the centerpiece of that plan.

The project announcement outlined plans for conveyance facilities on the Sacramento River, south of Sacramento in the North Delta. The facilities would be able to intake up to 9,000 cubic feet of water per second.

The project also would stop the reversal of water flow caused by the existing large pumps in the southern Delta, which Salazar called "fish-killing pumps."

The governor also recognized the seismic benefits of a new system that would sustain water supply in an earthquake.

A number of state and federal elected officials, along with fishermen and conservationists, have come out against the plan.

Rep. John Garamendi, D-Fairfield, rallied at the state Capitol on Wednesday to urge the governor to preserve the Delta with a focus on water storage, recycling, conservation, levee repairs and habitat restoration.

Congressional representatives who have expressed concern about the plan include Reps. George Miller, D-Martinez; Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena; Doris Matsui, D-Sacramento; Jerry McNerney, D-Stockton; Anna Eshoo, D-Palo
Alto; and Jackie Speier, D-San Mateo/San Francisco.

What do you think of this plan? Vote in our poll and then tell us what you think in the comments section.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Walnut Creek Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
WCJess May 19, 2013 at 02:44 pm
I hate sand in parks. Nice breeding area for lice, and a great place for ferrel cats to poop. IRead More can't wait for them to do the park at Arbolado.
Jojo Potato May 18, 2013 at 01:58 pm
How about you research the current ADA guidelines regarding surface materials for play areas?Read More Walnut Creek is simply acting to be in compliance. Not sure where you get the idea that wood chips are "much more dangerous". A reasonable overview of the current regulations can be found here: http://risk.utah.gov/newsletter/documents/playground_surfacing.pdf If you disagree with the regulations, please contact your representatives.